Friday, January 19, 2007

The Barclays Center: What's In a Name?

The deal to put the name of Barclays Bank on the Atlantic Yards Arena is stirring a bit of controversy. On Wednesday, Fans for Fair Play circulated an email digging into the bank's history. The new Brooklyn Paper's front-page headline is "Blood Money," which expands on the bank's historic connection to the slave trade, its role in World War II and its support for the apartheid government in South Africa, among other things.

Here's some of what Fans for Fair Play wrote in an email blast:
Ratner has just sealed a deal with a company that didn't just profit from, but was FOUNDED upon, slave-trade profits (1756). There are other disquieting machinations...apartheid funding, deals with French collaborators during WWII, current loans to exploitive mining operations in Congo, etc.
From the website itself, there is this about Barclays background:
* a major funder of South Africa's apartheid regime;
* a rotten place for women to work through the 1970s;
* sued by French Jewish holocaust survivors for working with French Nazi collaborators during World War II;
* funding exploitive mining operations in Congo;
The Brooklyn Paper reports that the company's senior archivist, Jessie Campbell, defended the bank’s link to slavery in a letter to the London paper, the Guardian, as something that must “be understood in the context of the times,” he wrote. “In the mid-18th century, trading in slaves was the norm.” During the Holocaust, the BP says, "Barclays’ French branches froze the accounts of their Jewish customers. After being sued by Hitler’s victims and their descendents, Barclays agreed in 1999 to pay $3.6 million in restitution. Nazi officials kept the proceeds from Jews’ forced property sales at Barclays, the suit charged."

Of course, one could criticize many financial institutions, especially ones whose history reaches back a century or more, on dealings 50 or 100 years ago. The same could be said of any number of multinational corporations. So, there will be many opinions around Brooklyn about this information and whether it is fair to bring it up. All that said, as information goes, the background on Barclays is fascinating.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The key sentence in this post is: "The same could be said of any number of multinational corporations."
This latest lame attack on Brooklyn's exciting and visionary development, which will transform an ugly wasteland into a world-class destination, is a pile of BS. Unless these critics are ready to live completely off the grid, they should just zip it. I hope none of these people drive VW's, use currency portraying our slave-owner presidents, have diamonds in their wedding rings, or let their children play with toys made in China. Sad.

9:56 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ratner has propped his political support up on a segment on the African-American population. That is why this matters. It shows his ....uhm.. every move is BS and all about dollars only. no big surprise there. but he and his supporters should be called on it.

if i'm not mistaken Apartheid is not "ancient history" and the Congolese war goes


as for diamond rings and toys from china or whatever, people buying those things aren't gaining there ability to buy them with public money, political support built on African-American support, public land, tax breaks and stealing peoples homes.

so your lame comment is just another non-answer to the tough questions that arisen over and over during the Atlantic Yards debate.

2:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ratner has propped his political support up on a segment on the African-American population. That is why this matters. It shows his ....uhm.. every move is BS and all about dollars only. no big surprise there. but he and his supporters should be called on it.

if i'm not mistaken Apartheid is not "ancient history" and the Congolese war goes


as for diamond rings and toys from china or whatever, people buying those things aren't gaining there ability to buy them with public money, political support built on African-American support, public land, tax breaks and stealing peoples homes.

so your lame comment is just another non-answer to the tough questions that arisen over and over during the Atlantic Yards debate.

2:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

thanks, Gersh.

Twice.

1:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

not gersh. and posting accident.
gersh has his own platform, one would think.

5:17 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home